Friday, June 24, 2005

So This is DashBlog

It looks like I'm going to have to abandon my old blogging naming convention as I have discovered the glory that is DashBlog, a little widget, I love widgets. This is my first dashed-blog, obviously and I hope it works.
I think this is all okay. I've been abandoning a lot of things as of late and hoping many others work. I think this may be the way of the world. I'm learning. This is good.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

13/

I am learning that I tend to like to blog drunk.

That said, I am moderately happy to review my own blog and find that I don't post too often. I suppose that means I rarely find myself drunk and alone. Of course, that would be a missapropriation of the facts. I am indeed, not alone. There are four other people in my house tonight. Three of them now live here.

On nights like this I wonder if should get drunk more often because I find my musings entertaining. they provide a unique solace I don't find anywhere else. But even in my addled mind I recognize that this is not a good place to be, it's just another place. I guess I pursue the same path as before: Blog drunk, when I get the chance. Exhibitionism for the insatibly shy.

But tonight, for me, in this mood, I am not merely exhibitioning. So once again, I put forth my plea for anyone who happens across this blog to drop a comment. Tonight I'm not so much interested in hearing myself ramble, as I hope to bait you into responding, because I could use some sound advice.

In the vaguest means possible (as I'm sure you're all aware that the most likely people to read the are the ones I would talk about were I to merely rant and I believe a blog should at least be honest, if not candid), here are a few of my questions:

1) At what point do human being stop being responsible for one another? Where does helpfulness become control and how much generosity is one supposed to bear?

2) What are the limits of "going with the flow", when does it become indecision, and then apathy?

3) How do know when you're being lied to (and implicitly, what defines a lie)?

4) What are the appropriate criteria to use when making a significant decision?

5) When in a compromising situation (and don't pretend like the rest of this doesn't make sense), who are the people you consistantly hurt and who do you spare? And what is the appropriateness/ramifications of this habit?

To the first person who can soundly nail all five (sorry, but the judgement is mine alone) 1 Anything bet, redeemable for anything, within reason. For anyone who finishes all five (with a realistic amount of sincereity) I will answer five questions of their's and issue my thanks for their help.

So go forth and think. It might just be good for us all.

Thursday, April 07, 2005

12/

It just occured to me that when I was younger (probably around 10 though I couldn't say for sure), my step sister who was a little older than me had started to run with a less than desireable crowd. They were immigrant Russians and I can't vouch for them either way, but I do know that it caused a riff between my step-mother and my father. My step mother had given up control of her oldest daughter and my father was still heavy handed in his new role as her dad. He was very forceful with Nikki that she was not to hang out with these people. They were trouble. Instead, in an attempt to deliver the same advice in a more timely fashion to his own son, he told me this:

"Drew, in life friends will come and go, but family is forever."

Of course I had no perspective at 10. I was simultaneously sure that I had kept both my friends and family my entire life (because in all practicality I had) and and also sure that neither was permanent (if for no other reason than death).

Well, the advice turned out to be wrong in a way that even invalidates its inverse. But what a simpering hypocritical bitch my father turned out to be.

So here's some folksy wisdom to replace it, should you have ever been given similar bad advice:

Pride is a weakness, no matter how much strength it takes.

Thursday, March 31, 2005

11/

A new goal:

In the age of Pokemon and Beanie Babies we all need something to collect. This combined with a constant need for money (which automatically precludes most collecting) and a disinterest in most mainstream things (like Beanie Babies and Pokemon) I have decided to up the ante and create a life experience collection list. In this case, I want to develop a list of trashy jobs that one should hold and a tally of how I'm doing. I invite you, my loyal readership of possibly one to join me and add as many as you can think of. Here's what I have:

Movie Rental Store Clerk (done)
Gas Station Attendant (done)
Waiter (doing)
Bartender (arguably the same thing as waiting, but too much cooler and financially advantageous to be the same)
Valet (I applied for this today)
Camp Councelor (done)
Medical Test Subject (Techinically I did have new ultrasound equiptment used on me, but I may have to pursue this a little futher to nail it down. I believe this one is crucial to atruely trashy income)
Model (Again, I techinically modeled for the ultra sound people, but this one isn't important enought to follow up on. In fact, I think it's rather cool to subvert this category)
Security Guard (desk attendant, let's not kid ourselves, it's the same thing)
"freelancing" (otherwise known as scamming your way through on crap odd jobs and credit cards, done)
bum/unemployed (been unemployed, but never been payed for it)
Construction Laborer (done and done)

So it looks like I'm rounding out the end of the collection. Bartender, Valet and a couple of medical tests and I'll have caught them all, unless you the viewing public can help me out and name off a few others. Because let's face it, it's not about the having, it's about the getting.

Friday, March 25, 2005

10/

George Carlin once said that no one can ever truely know what they look like in sunglasses.

I'll take it a step further: No one can ever truely know what they look like. Two steps: Or smell, feel, taste, or sound like. It is infact impossible to have any objective view on one's self. It's contray to the whole idea.
(Admittedly this assumes a self-concept derived through the 5 senses, but I defy you to comment with any argument fleshing out my concession).

That said considering my solipsotic outlook, means the one thing that I know is that I know nothing.

Wrap your head around that worthless zen.

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

9/

New job. I'll write about that later. Instead, as I have been getting complaints about not writing often enough (which I admittedly don't) I have an extra long diatribe about what it should be like to almost die. You asked for it, you got it, both barrels.

So Jim, Doug and I got caught out on a jetti and almost died. Difinitively, we all went through hypothermia, as the water surface temperature was at 36 degrees and the air was barely above that. Now, the story of that is interesting, but it's better told in person, preferably with all of us there, as all good stories are. So I'm not going to try and recount it. That'd be silly. What I find more interesting is the reaction; the world's, Jim's, and of course my own. Unfortunately, the last of those still remains vacant, and so I'm here.

First off, I am amazed to find that no one cared (and when I say no one, mean anyone I have yet to hear from, since, for example, I'm rather sure my mother would gush and worry at the danger, which is probably the reason I haven't told her). To come through an ordeal of that sort and find the world completely unsimpathetic seems to be counter-intuitive to the whole damn scheme of things. Sure, we were stupid and shouldn't have been out there and we definately should have watched the tide closer and we shouldn't have been doing drugs and we could have called for help and when it's all said and done, it was all our fault. But that's not the point. The bottom line, from a participant perspective, is: we. almost. died. There is no other way to cut it. There is no rationalizing or blame placing. We almost died. If you're religious (and for some this kind of event traditionally brings it out), we almost met our maker. If you're kinda organic, mother nature showed us her awsome might. If you're in the wash of seething, indefinite masses with the rest of us there is only "almost died", but that is no paultry phrase either. Yet no one gives a damn. This to me is weird.

The first excuse I can revel for the incompassionate is "Well, they weren't there so they don't really understand". So let me dismiss that right off. It's complete rationalizing bullshit. No, of course they weren't there, but that's a lame cop-out as most people are rarely at the actual place of the event for which they are mustering compassion. This is a weak habit we have all become accostomed to because we are ashamed to be incompetant at telling the story in a manner which deserves compassion. Well, this one's simple. We almost died. No one disputes this. We can use terms like "hypothermia" to amp it up, but really the only important element for the listener is the word "died". People muster feelings for animals when they look sad, all we want is recognition of the importance carried by an elementary word. So all "you had to be there" arguments are out.

Then I thought "Well, they probably don't care, we made it out after all". Mmmm... this one feels good. It's so easy. We are safe (And happy!) and we'll go on living our crazy lives with crazy adventure. Hell, we already shared a few good laughs over the whole thing. The cynic in me loves this one. Bullshit. No forgiveness on round two. Here's the thing: In the same way that only black people can safely use any term to define their race and alcoholics have support groups. While they may not have to be there, and because they weren't there, Ithink they ought show some respect. Only we can laugh at this without displaying any other emotions. Dispite my condemnation of the "you had to be there" ideal, it is also a joke to believe that because we're alive in front of them, that they too are granted the priveledges of cheating death. Death is (perhaps) the last great unknown, and the answer to many questions that plague us throughout life. No one gets to laugh it off immediately. We forged the waters, so we get our laugh. I can't speak for the other two, but I had my reckoning and showed my respect when the water reached about chest deep. No one I tell this story acctually did it, so my argument follows that they also don't reap the benefits. It seems to me that the listener should pay repect to death, acknowledge we almost died, and then laugh over a beer. When the laughing comes first, it makes my 4 foot deep epiphany seem a little trite. The laughing seems to say "Dumbass, you were going to make it anyway" or worse "I am already okay with death, it's hard to believe it took hypothermia for you to come to terms". This, of course, plays perfectly with the lack of other emotions I mentioned. People think they're going with the flow. Well, stop. Respect death. Pay your due dilligence. Fuck, if they can't access it directly, throw in a story about how they almost died, anything to clue us in that they've been there and they know. Talk, then laugh, chastise, ignore or whatever their bent for dealing with post-humous crisis may be. We went through our rainbow of feelings all on our own, in freezing water, without the guarentee we would get to recount them. So number two is out, because it's just downright inconsiderate. No one is above an "oh my gosh" to show us you get the severity. Otherwise, it looks like they don't believe us or they don't care, whichever is worse.

Then I decided to swallow my own medicine and have some compassion for the unsympathetic. I'll stop this line of argument right here because there is no sense in excusing people for being heartless and weak. Compassion is not a large request.

So what's left? I don't know. Those seem to be a pretty comprehensive set of excuses to cut up for an angry man. Yet I am forgetting the one that plagues me most: What if it really didn't matter? Which brings me to Jim's reaction. Jim handled the whole thing differently than I did and I can't say I really know what was or is going though his head. However, I do know (since he's told me) that this notion bothers him too. What's interesting is that Jim's issue was not (like mine) based in outrage at the world's complete damn ignorance of what happened and how it should be handled. Jim instead, worried about himself. It is not uncommon when people have near death experiences (and allow me to interject that Jim went through shock as well, a step of trauma Doug and I some how evaded) that once through their ordeal they find God. Now, I'm not pretending that Jim found God or even, for that matter, was looking for God. However, he got absolutely nothing. No revelation, no God, no repurposing of life, or clearer priorities. He doesn't love his girlfriend any more, he doesn't work harder, he doesn't hold a new respect for life. Aside from perhaps a keener eye for tide tables Jim on the whole remained relatively unchanged with one exception: He couldn't figure out why nothing change. When he mentioned this to me, I immediately saw his point. Nothing did change, hell, I coudn't even get a smack of awe let alone a concern for my almost vanished life or (dare I hope) a little notice for heroism in the face of danger. But Jim didn't care about that, so I shut up. Jim worried about the implications of cheating death and finding nothing. He wanted to know what happens when one is forced to tangibly concieve death and comes to no real conclusion. What does it mean to NOT find God?

On this note, I took the idea of taking stock of one's life. What realizing death did to me, and I believe does to many, is force you to reconsider your life. People always talk about how they go through mid-life crises or they find religion or suddenly have an undying respect for the simple pleasures in life. So I told Jim, when he took a long hard look at himself, he didn't have any qualms. In all honesty, I didn't find God either, so in a way I was speaking for myself more than for him, but I think the point stands. In fact, though unsatisfying, we had the perfect response. It just turns out that the world at large is a little fucked up (or at least refuses to notice their fucked up-edness) and when they take stock of their lives they find they need major revisions. So society taught Jim and I to look for moments when we get to make drastic changes. It's like a get out of jail free card, when you almost die you get to start over and these cards (apparently) are not handed out often. They seem to consist of major event's like weddings and graduations and then sporadic ones like mid-life crisies and near death experiences. Otherwise, the world kinda wants you to stick with the plan and save your revisions. Turns out, we don't have to do either.

Wait wait, here's another excuse: People expect it from us. I love this one in the way that I love dead baby jokes. It makes me laugh that sinister uncontrollable laugh because I feel like it lets me have it both ways. Here's what I mean: On one hand, I get to be cool, because crap like this is only nothing to someone who can do it any time or all the time. So they automatically project cool on to me, which is nice. Then, I also get to keep my indignant attitude that everyone has shunned the importance of what happened, because being cool is not synonymous with being understood. In fact, it's probably more to the other end. In fact, it's way to the other end. I'll stick my neck out there and challenge anyone to argue someone they know really well is cool to them. The reason I say this is because cool is an alienating category. You might respect someone, find them funny, think they dress well, dig their music, but as soon as you get that one dirty secret nailed to the floor, they will never be cool again. Hell, it doesn't even have to be dirty. The first time you see someone asleep, use the bathroom, or do any of the other mundane "one-leg-at-a-time" things that everone does, they are no longer cool. They can still be a plethora of great adjectives, but cool demands a certain amount of distance, which is why this excuse is also faulty. People who nearly die aren't looking to be cool. No one tries to almost die so they can improve their street cred (that may not be entirely true, but I think we can safely discount the lunatics who do). Instead, the expectation that we always make it through this kind of harrowing experience only serves to rob us of the uniqueness inherent to the event. It makes death like shopping, and we all know it's not. It's like taxes.

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

8/

I won't lie Christmas was hard. There is something about family which I will never understand and it is perhaps this strange dynamic that fascinates me, to some degree. While I feel my family spent a large portion of our vacation together fighting, as I left yesterday morning, they each took a moment to mention that they would miss me. In their own way. My brother, teased me saying he would seen me soon enough. At eleven he has an odd sense of irony. My mother awoke at 5:00 am, despite saying she wouldn't to tell my grand parents that she and I see each other all the time and to make sure I'd left what I could not pack for her to bring home. So we could see each other again. My grandmother talked about the cheap rates on Jet Blue while she prepared a lunch I didn't ask for. My grandfather insisted on driving me to the airport, alone. Though I have been feeling this a lot lately, I learned a little life lesson. As each person baited me into seeing them, they were seeking my approval. I know, it sounds a little arrogant and basic, but bear with me. I have spent my entire life tring to pay my debt with these people. I have wanted nothing but to be validated and make good all the work they have put into me, but I found a humbling ideal in their goodbyes. The fact I exist is that validation. They have recieved their payment in being able to raise and be around me. They feel they have passed something on and because I am they vessel, they feel indebted to me. This I could not handle. How do you give approval to the one you seek it from?

My grandfather has a box marked DOD, for Destroy On Death. The idea behind this box is that my grandfather keeps things in it that are singularly important to him. They have, he argues, no value to anyone else. But the unspoken text behind this moniker is that he cannot part with them, so they are to be destroyed after his death. I cannot express the layered emotion this evokes in me, in ways beyond the role of a dutiful grandson. Here a man keeps his life's work in a box, certain it means nothing to anyone, even his family and closest friends. To him it is invaluable, but as he sees it, to others his life means very little. While on the surface, I do feel deeply sad about this, but moreover I am filled with admiration. In his seven decades, my grandfather has learned and passed on to me a simple lesson that has confounded me and rippled my life with strife: Though it will always seem that no one is interested in what you do, and that you honestly believe it may blink out of existance the moment you take your last breath, you must pursue it. From the way my grandfather talks there are acctually two reasons for this. The first is more poetic, that in between paying bills and desparately trying to stay alive in the society we inherited, what we do that we think doesn't matter bleeds into what we do everyday. Everything in that box is why my grandmother loves him, and in some ways why my mother is insecure. For me, my grandfather believed at most it held practicality that could advance me in life. The truely sad part is what he forgot; he forgot the life that happened to get it in there.

The second reason is more trite. No matter what you think, it will indeed mean something to someone when they find it. It is almost an arrogant statement to believe you could spend your life on something that means nothing. In fact, it can't. It is only a reflection of the shallowness of the viewer. This vacation, I saw what was in the box.

I finally found out what my grandfather spent the majority of his life doing. For years I have told all my friends that my grandfather worked on the first barcode. I still don't know if this is exactly true, but the real issue is that I could never pin down exactly what he did. I said he worked on it, but I could never say what he did. Now I know, he was a system analyst for IBM. What's funny about this is that what he did is very simliar to what I have found myself doing, and explains the spurs of inexplicable intrest I have in things such as web design. That's how I got him to open the box. My grandfather was awed that what he did could teach his grandson something. I am not sure I will ever get to experience this (as I have no intention of having children), but my grandfather swelled with a pride that belied his humility. As he pulled off the tape and trivialized the contents of the box, I could tell he was beside himself. He never believed he would get to see what was in there again as there would never be a reason to look at it. As he opened it he was able to relive the best part of his life, that as I mentioned, he thought he would never see and no one would be interested in. For that moment, I envied him

---

It's difficult for the left side of my brain to accept the myriad of ideas the right side constantly puts forth. I try desperately to solidify my emotions in to one identifiable block, not for others or to present a single identity to the public, but solely for myself.
While I know this is normal, I find it impossibly difficult.

---

I want to emulate those I love, and perhaps in this I lose my own voice. It seems I hate everything I say simply because I said it. It doesn't interest me. What I've found compels me to art, is that i can identify with it, that by having someone else say it, I feel vindicated, that I am not alone. Thus, when I reread my work, I do not feel that. I know what it has to say and unless I can contrive some amusement or find it particularly clever, there is no way to be vindicated, as enjoying my art still leaves me alone.

---

I am very scared of the future. Yet all those around me have faith in me, which I don't understand, because try as I might, I can't have faith in me.